Political anger and fear shape preferences for leaders’ facial traits

Home › News › Political anger and fear shape preferences for leaders’ facial traits

Published on

October 10, 2026

Manos Tsakiris

Professor of Psychology

Organization

When citizens evaluate political candidates, their choices may depend heavily on the emotions triggered by current issues — even before they consider a candidate’s policies or party. A recent study by NOMIS Awardee Manos Tsakiris and Mariana Von Mohr reveals that feelings of anger and fear systematically alter the facial traits voters prefer in their leaders. The findings were published in Cognition and Emotion.

In the study, researchers presented US Democrats and Republicans with computer-generated facial pairs varying in dominance and trustworthiness. Participants selected faces they believed would best handle specific political issues that made them either angry or afraid.

When people felt angry, they were more likely to choose a dominant-looking leader: 49.5% of choices favored dominance, compared with 46.5% when they felt afraid. More importantly, anger made participants weigh facial dominance more heavily and trustworthiness less heavily, while fear increased their reliance on trustworthiness cues. In other words, anger seemed to prime people for confrontation, whereas fear encouraged a search for protection and reassurance.

The findings matter because elections often run on emotionally charged issues. In contemporary politics, campaigns and media frequently amplify specific emotional narratives. Because subtle emotional shifts can alter how voters weigh leadership traits, political framing that stirs anger versus fear could meaningfully sway election outcomes.

Related news

Read the Cognition and Emotion publication: Political emotions shape preferences for leaders’ facial traits: anger favours dominance, fear favours trustworthiness